Hardik Patel moves SC against Gujarat High Court order rejecting stay on his conviction in 2015 Vispur rioting case

Hardik Patel moves SC against Gujarat High Court order rejecting stay on his conviction in 2015 Vispur rioting case

Hardik Patel, 25, had started preparations to contest from Jamnagar on a Congress ticket after joining the party on 12 March and the last date for filing of nominations is 4 April

Advertisement
Hardik Patel moves SC against Gujarat High Court order rejecting stay on his conviction in 2015 Vispur rioting case

New Delhi: Congress leader Hardik Patel on Monday moved the Supreme Court challenging the Gujarat High Court order rejecting his plea to stay his conviction in the 2015 Vispur rioting case.

File photo of Patidar leader Hardik Patel. PTI

His petition is likely to be mentioned on Tuesday for urgent hearing and his lawyers would seek stay of the 29 March order of the High Court which is coming in the way of his contesting the Lok Sabha election.

Advertisement

Patel, 25, had started preparations to contest from Jamnagar on a Congress ticket after joining the party on 12 March and the last date for filing of nominations is 4 April.

Polling for 26 Lok Sabha seats in Gujarat will be held on 23 April. The Sessions Court at Visnagar in Mehsana district sentenced Patel to two years’ imprisonment in July, 2018 for rioting and arson in Visnagar town in 2015 during the Patidar quota stir which he led.

The high court in August 2018 had suspended the sentence but not the conviction. Under the Election Law – Representation of the People Act and a related Supreme Court ruling – a convict facing a jail term of two years or more cannot stand for election unless the conviction is stayed.

In the high court, the state government had submitted that there were 17 FIRs including two sedition complaints against Patel who is known for making inflammatory speeches.

Advertisement

The high court had declined the contention of Patel’s lawyers that if the conviction was not stayed, it will cause “irreparable damage” as he intended to contest the Lok Sabha election.

In the order, the high court noted that a conviction can be stayed only in rare and exceptional cases, and the case did not fall into that category.

Advertisement
Latest News

Find us on YouTube

Subscribe

Top Shows

Vantage First Sports Fast and Factual Between The Lines