The pictorial warning up to 85% is not a reasonable restriction and falls foul of Article 19(1)(g) (right to carry on business) of the Constitution,
, 3 months
SC stays Karnataka HC order on 85% tobacco pictorial warning
Kapil Sibal - Quotes
It seems the government is keen that this (allegations against the CJI) must not be allowed to be inquired into. They don’t want this information to come on record,
, 2 hours
Naidu rejects CJI impeachment notice; Cong to move SC challenging decision
We are confident that when we move that petition, the CJI has nothing to do with it so that it is heard and the serious issues which are constitutional in nature, and which will determine whether w...
, 6 hours
Opposition calls Venkaiah Naidu’s decision illegal, Congress says MPs to challenge orde...
It is illegal, because the chairman has passed an order which is required to be passed after a full-fledged inquiry,
, 7 hours
Congress to move Supreme Court as Venkaiah Naidu rejects CJI impeachment notice; legal ...
We wish this day had never come,
, 3 days
Congress-led Opposition pushes for CJI Dipak Misra's impeachment
Nude gunman kills four at Nashville waffle house
FT names Raghuram Rajan as possible candidate for Bank of England's top job
It’s a boy: Kate, wife of UK’s Prince William, gives birth to third child
Constitution of India